Productivity

𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗲𝗿𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝘁𝗼𝗽𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗽𝗿𝗶𝘀𝗲. Because most people explain it from the inside out: policies, councils, standards, stewardship. But the business does not buy any of that. The business buys outcomes: → trustworthy KPIs → vendor and partner data you can actually use → faster financial close → fewer reporting escalations → smoother M&A integration → AI you can deploy without creating risk debt Most AI programs fail for boring reasons: nobody owns the data, quality is unknown, access is messy, accountability is missing. 𝗦𝗼 𝗹𝗲𝘁’𝘀 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝗶𝘁. 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀: → ownership → quality → access → accountability 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗽𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗸 𝗶𝗻 𝟰 𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗲𝗿𝘀: 1. Data Products (what the business consumes) → a named dataset with an owner and SLA → clear definitions + metric logic → documented inputs/outputs and intended use → discoverable in a catalog → versioned so changes don’t break reporting 2. Data Management (how products stay reliable) → quality rules + monitoring (freshness, completeness, accuracy) → lineage (where it came from, where it’s used) → master/reference data alignment → metadata management (business + technical) → access controls and retention rules 3. Data Governance (who decides, who is accountable) → data ownership model (domain owners, stewards) → decision rights: who can change KPI definitions, thresholds, and sources → issue management: triage, escalation paths, resolution SLAs → policy enforcement: what’s mandatory vs optional → risk and compliance alignment (auditability, approvals) 4. Data Operating Model (how you scale across the enterprise) → domain-based setup (data mesh or not, but clear domains) → operating cadence: weekly issue review, monthly KPI governance, quarterly standards → stewardship at scale (roles, capacity, incentives) → cross-domain decision-making for shared metrics → enablement: templates, playbooks, tooling support If you want to start fast: Pick the 10 metrics that run the business. Assign an owner. Define decision rights + escalation. Then build the data products around them. ↓ 𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝘆 𝗮𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗮𝘀 𝗔𝗜 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗵𝗮𝗽𝗲𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀, 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗮 𝗹𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗳 𝘃𝗮𝗹𝘂𝗲 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗺𝘆 𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿: https://lnkd.in/dbf74Y9E

STUDY FINDS COST PER WEAR INFORMATION SHIFTS SHOPPERS TO QUALITY: A new study published in Psychology & Marketing offers a fascinating look at what fashion drives fashion purchasing decisions. Researchers from the University of Bath and Cambridge University found that simply showing consumers the cost per wear (CPW) of garments (price divided by the number of times an item can be worn) can shift preferences away from cheap, low-quality clothing toward higher-priced, longer-lasting options. The findings draw on behavioural psychology to reveal that people respond more to perceived 'economic value' than to abstract sustainability messages. When shoppers could compare CPW between garments, and especially when figures were backed by trusted certification, they were far more likely to choose quality over quantity. The authors suggest CPW could be a powerful tool for brands and policymakers seeking to reframe sustainability as smart spending. Full story in comments.

You’re not burned out—you’re just taking breaks the wrong way. Here’s how to fix it, based on science. Want to perform better? Take better breaks. Breaks today are where sleep was 15 years ago—underrated and misunderstood. But how you take a break matters. Most people think more work = more productivity. But research shows that strategic breaks are the real key to staying sharp. The problem? Most of us take breaks that don’t actually help. Scrolling alone at your desk? Not it. Here’s how to take a break that actually works: Move, don’t sit – Walk, stretch, or get outside instead of staying glued to your chair. Movement resets your brain. Go outside, not inside – Fresh air and sunlight restore energy and boost creativity. Be social, not solo – Breaks are more effective when taken with someone else. Fully unplug – Leave your phone. No work talk. No emails. No scrolling. Just a real reset. Try this: Take a 10-minute walk outside with a colleague. Talk about anything but work. Leave your phone at your desk. Watch how much better you feel—and perform. Breaks aren’t a luxury. They’re a performance tool. Treat them like it. Got a break routine that works for you? Drop it below Or send this to someone who needs a real break.

🔎 𝗟𝗼𝗼𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹 AMD 𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗽! 😲 Here's a bit of a Ryzen processor made on TSMC's 7-nanometer node. You can see the web of interconnects, the metal wires that connect the transistors (that bottom layer) on a chip to harness their computing power. The image was taken with a new 𝗽𝘁𝘆𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝗶𝗰 𝗫-𝗿𝗮𝘆 𝗹𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗼𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗽𝗵𝘆 (𝗣𝘆𝗫𝗟) technique out of the PSI Paul Scherrer Institut, University of Southern California and ETH Zürich. The technique currently has 4 nanometer resolution and the scientists have a path to get to 1 nm resolution. The cool thing about this technology is its non-destructive imaging power to help find defects in chips. Today’s chips are so complicated that electrical tests alone can no longer pinpoint where a defect is: chipmakers use a mix of optical imaging and other methods to zero in on potential problem areas. They then image such areas with a slow but very high-resolution scanning electron microscope. Finally they might take a slice of a chip for further imaging with a transmission electron microscope (TEM). When they find the flaw, they can then go back and correct their design. But with PyXL, they have another tool to pinpoint defects without destroying the chip. ✨

Last week, I described four design patterns for AI agentic workflows that I believe will drive significant progress: Reflection, Tool use, Planning and Multi-agent collaboration. Instead of having an LLM generate its final output directly, an agentic workflow prompts the LLM multiple times, giving it opportunities to build step by step to higher-quality output. Here, I'd like to discuss Reflection. It's relatively quick to implement, and I've seen it lead to surprising performance gains. You may have had the experience of prompting ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini, receiving unsatisfactory output, delivering critical feedback to help the LLM improve its response, and then getting a better response. What if you automate the step of delivering critical feedback, so the model automatically criticizes its own output and improves its response? This is the crux of Reflection. Take the task of asking an LLM to write code. We can prompt it to generate the desired code directly to carry out some task X. Then, we can prompt it to reflect on its own output, perhaps as follows: Here’s code intended for task X: [previously generated code] Check the code carefully for correctness, style, and efficiency, and give constructive criticism for how to improve it. Sometimes this causes the LLM to spot problems and come up with constructive suggestions. Next, we can prompt the LLM with context including (i) the previously generated code and (ii) the constructive feedback, and ask it to use the feedback to rewrite the code. This can lead to a better response. Repeating the criticism/rewrite process might yield further improvements. This self-reflection process allows the LLM to spot gaps and improve its output on a variety of tasks including producing code, writing text, and answering questions. And we can go beyond self-reflection by giving the LLM tools that help evaluate its output; for example, running its code through a few unit tests to check whether it generates correct results on test cases or searching the web to double-check text output. Then it can reflect on any errors it found and come up with ideas for improvement. Further, we can implement Reflection using a multi-agent framework. I've found it convenient to create two agents, one prompted to generate good outputs and the other prompted to give constructive criticism of the first agent's output. The resulting discussion between the two agents leads to improved responses. Reflection is a relatively basic type of agentic workflow, but I've been delighted by how much it improved my applications’ results. If you’re interested in learning more about reflection, I recommend: - Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedback, by Madaan et al. (2023) - Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learning, by Shinn et al. (2023) - CRITIC: Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Tool-Interactive Critiquing, by Gou et al. (2024) [Original text: https://lnkd.in/g4bTuWtU ]

It’s simple math 🧐 I use to think that motivation was the key to monumental success. Long story short, it’s not. It’s about the little things you do every day that will take you from reasonable to slightly unreasonable to completely unreasonable progress. Your future is not defined by how motivated you are, but by your daily routines and systems. I believe in this so much that we named our company Butterfly 3ffect to reflect the value of incremental gains. we believe that that’s how the best people and brands grow. Here’s how you grow the small way: 1. Start by setting achievable goals, like reading one chapter of a book each day or going for a short walk 2. Practice gratitude by writing down three things you're thankful for every night before bed 3. Engage in daily self-reflection, even if it's just for a few minutes, to assess your thoughts and actions 4. Incorporate small acts of kindness into your daily routine, like holding the door for someone or offering a genuine compliment 5. Learn something new every day, whether it's a fun fact, a new word, or a new skill 6. Prioritise self-care by getting enough sleep, staying hydrated, and taking breaks when needed 7. Surround yourself with positive influences, whether it's uplifting books, supportive friends, or inspiring podcasts 8. Embrace failure as a learning opportunity and a stepping stone to growth 9. Stay consistent and patient, knowing that small progress over time adds up to significant improvement 10. Celebrate your achievements, no matter how small, to stay motivated and encouraged along the way.

Do you feel guilty about taking time off? I used to spend weekends, trips, and lunch breaks (!!) terrified that I was falling behind. I had to constantly fight the compulsion to get back to my inbox. Now I remind myself: Your mental health is the foundation for your ability to do great work. We often think of vacations or breaks as rewards we need to earn. This is backward thinking. Your wellbeing is what allows you to achieve your goals. A successful career depends on you having rested enough to be creative, show up for others, and make good decisions. It sounds obvious but it bears repeating: When you fail to take the time you need to recharge, you set yourself up to fail.

Right now, every CEO is wondering the same thing: “How can artificial intelligence help maximize our impact?”   Delivering on the promise of AI isn’t just good business, it has the potential to help us address some of society’s most pressing challenges. So today, I wanted to offer a closer look at how AI is helping us discover new medicines at Novartis.   The process of identifying a new drug, running patient clinical trials, and bringing it to market takes over a decade. Each new medicine costs on average $2 billion to develop, and we know nearly 9 in 10 of the treatments we work on will fail before they ever reach patients.   A major early step in that process is identifying individual targets in the body that we want to design a drug for. Once we identify that target, which most commonly is a protein, we look for molecules that might address the target’s underlying issue – ultimately those molecule structures form the basis for every successful treatment.   Unlocking the right protein and molecular structures is complex stuff – each step often takes years to get right and our scientists consider billions of potential chemical structures that might lead to effective and safe drug candidates.   AI offers us the chance to accelerate that process. Working with partners at Isomorphic Labs – including members of the Google DeepMind team that were awarded the Nobel Prize this year – we’re now able to do things like model how a protein folds and interacts with the molecules we design. AI models also make it possible for us to analyze different chemical structures simultaneously. It has the potential to add up to significant time savings for our drug development scientists and their work to predict what molecules might treat specific diseases better and faster.   We’re just at the beginning of what this technology can do. As we incorporate AI throughout Novartis’ work, I’m excited to see all the ways it helps us unlock the mysteries of human biology, so we can deliver better medicines that improve and extend patients’ lives.

The ability to create clarity when there’s no shortage of chaos, opinions, and competing priorities is a rare skill. In any reasonably competent company, this skill alone will help take you quite far, fairly quickly. Concretely, this means creating clarity on the main problems, clarity on the right solutions, and clarity on the action plan & priorities. Very few people can do this well even though most people possess the intelligence necessary to do it. This is because most people in the workplace have been conditioned to add more information, sound more clever, satisfy more stakeholders, and feign more precision & certainty than is possible. Few understand that clarity in a chaotic situation can only emerge from subtraction, never from addition. Clarity comes from communicating what stands out as most important, why it is most important, how it will be achieved, and last but not the least, giving people a way of thinking about why it is okay, even great, that we aren’t doing All The Other Things.

I struggled with work/life balance throughout my career. This is because the world has set a clever, two-part trap for us. I will explain the trap and how to escape it. Part One – Our own goals and ambitions. I wanted to be successful, to get more pay, and to be a part of bigger decisions. If you follow me here, I bet you are the same. You want to “be the best” and have a great career. Part Two – Corporate pressure. Companies have a simple goal of making profits for shareholders. This is most easily done by getting more work from the same people. The Trap: The two parts converge to destroy work/life balance because our healthy desire to do good work, earn a living, and find meaning is easily manipulated by corporate systems designed to maximize profits. Here is how they do it: 1) Most companies give bigger raises to “better” performers. What is better? Usually, doing more work. Sometimes you can be “better” by being smarter or more efficient, but over time even the best of us usually work harder 2) Competition. Since raises and promotions are limited in number, there will always be someone else willing to put in very long hours to come out ahead of you. Some of you will recognize this as “the prisoner’s dilemma” – if only one person works harder, they will get a lot of advantages for only a little extra work. But, when we all strive to be first it becomes a maximum effort race with no winners. Ways to Escape the Trap: 1) Set limits. Recognize the trap and decide what you will and will not give to your work. This may mean accepting some career tradeoffs, but unless you set the limits your body will do it for you over time. It is better to make the choices yourself. 2) Seek work only you can do. We are all gifted at some things, and you get two benefits from focusing on your gifts. First, you can stay ahead of others with less effort. Second, it is more fun to do things that come easily. 3) Choose companies and bosses wisely. Some leaders push you into the trap, some leaders try to keep you out of it. Seek those that keep you out. 4) Work for yourself. If you can be your own boss you can escape the corporate side of profit maximization, or at least have it under your control. 5) Redefine success. There is nothing wrong with wanting pay, promotions, influence, etc. But if the cost gets too high, remember that plenty of people are happy without corporate success. My own path was to climb the ladder, make the money, and then step off. I sacrificed many good years to work and high stress in order to get a set of years without it. A good trade? Time will tell. Readers, what are some other ways to escape the trap?